Since October 21st SAG-AFTRA has been picketing many developers and publishers in the video game industry. It has been announced that Insomniac Games has been added to the list. During the month of November the union is planning to picket outside the development offices of Insomniac. They are not the first that have been hit with a picket, and will be joining the likes of EA and Warner Bros. The pickets have been a result of a failure to come to terms over many of the unions demands. The union stands by that the demands are not so out of hand, and what they are asking for is entirely fair. One of the biggest demands was that actors receive “full scale payment” for every 500,000 units sold. Another addressed the “secrecy” issue of games, citing that actors have to sometime audition for parts with knowing nothing about them. In return the gaming industry has offered a 9% wage increase, but many still claim it’s not enough. That voice acting for video games is vastly unfair in comparison to other forms of voice acting. Multiple voice actors have stepped forward in support of the strike including Jennifer Hale and Wil Wheaton. Problems range from under pay, to odd hours, to there being no further compensation for motion capture. Crispin Freeman has stated that this is about the industry treating voice actors as though they don’t matter. It is sad that the strike is still going, and even sadder to watch the list of developers being struck grow. I personally hope to see a good ending to this strike. While I do love video games, it is important that the industry treat it’s voice actors fairly and in a way that is comparable to other industries. If you are curious as to what games are specifically being struck and which are not you can visit these links. Struck and Non-Struck
We now have our first official release date for a Mario game for mobile. Super Mario Run will be launching December 15th for all iOS platforms. What we know is fairly limited at this point. The core game will have multiple different world themes as is expected from Mario games. It is also meant to be played one handed with Mario constantly moving and gamers only having control of jumps. In addition to the core Mario mode there will also be a kingdom builder and a Toad’s Rally mode. The Rally mode allows you to compete with others, while Kingdom builder seems to be a cosmetic feature. The game is going to be on the pricey side for mobile games, costing $9.99. As so little is known about it at this point, there is no news if there will then be further microtransactions to follow up with the game. My personal hope is that Nintendo keeps any additional charges for this (and future mobile games) limited to cosmetic, or not at all. It is hard for me personally to get excited for a new mobile game when so many rely so heavily on microstransactions. Honestly I have been iffy about Nintendo shifting to an emphasis on mobile games and I still am. Super Mario Run does seem like an enjoyable mobile game, and the price is large enough that they might avoid the negative direction that most mobile games takes. It doesn’t appear that there is anything really unique about this Mario game, other than Mario constantly running. If Nintendo is going to focus so heavily on mobile game I would hope that they would bring something unique to the mobile experience. That being said I have to admit any judgement at this point is purely speculative. We will know more with Super Mario Run actually launches, and when we see feature games from Nintendo. For now iOS owners get ready to bring Mario to new devices.
A good setting is vital to a video game. While good gameplay can carry a game, a great environment with that gameplay takes it that next step. When talking about in-game worlds there are so many different ones that deserve credit. It’s almost impossible to narrow down the list to just a few. The following are a few that deserve credit as being some of the best worlds to be explored by gamers. Whether impressive in their size, detail, or just aesthetically appealing, these worlds are just downright amazing to explore.
While not the most popular RPG, Eternal Sonata deserves credit for the truly unique world in which it is set. Centered around the life of Chopin, Eternal Sonata is supposed to be the fever dream that he has while on his death bed. This is an interesting concept and manages to weave a beautiful world. Naturally the world is very focused on music giving it a very wonderful atmosphere. With the characters you explore many different settings, each one detailed, colorful, and aesthetically appealing. As far as ideas for a video game environment the last dream of a very talented artist is a wonderful idea.
Elder Scrolls: Daggerfall
Daggerfall earns it’s place on the list due to it’s size. It can proudly claim to be one of the largest in-game environments ever created with a shocking 15,000 in-game locations for players to explore. If that weren’t impressive enough add in fact that terrain is randomly generated. It can not be over stated how large this environment is. It’s also incredible because the game came out in 1996, and despite all the time that has passed few games have gotten close to having a world this large. It’s an interesting and fun place to explore, but it’s size is what makes it so special.
The UnderGarden is in a class of it’s own in many aspects. It is not very action packed, instead focusing on puzzles. The environment is a major focus of this game. You swim through the worlds, they start darker but you spread light and colors to them. Most of your actions serve to grow flowers and add to the setting. It’s a very calming world, and rather exquisite. Because you are interacting directly with the environment it starts to feel like it’s own character almost, and restoring it brings a certain level of joy.
South Park: Stick of Truth
What I think gives Stick of Truth one of the best environments is how true it is to the show. Running through the town in the game is like running through an episode. A lot of attention is paid to the location of certain buildings, as well as putting a lot of buildings in that were call backs to earlier episodes. Taking the time to make sure it looks like the show, and then adding many of the fan’s favorite places really makes Stick of Truth shine.
This franchise does an amazing job of putting gamers in different settings. Part of what is so fun about this series is getting to explore old worlds in a realistic way of how they would have been. Using real landmarks, and the knowledge the teams have available they do their best to take gamers into the past. Whether it’s expoloring the middle east during the third crusade, or America during the Revolutionary War this franchise allows gamers to play in history. There was some creative liberty taken of course, but it remains enjoyable none the less.
Shadow of the Colossus
Shadow of the Colossus is interesting because not only does it include standard environments, but the colossi themselves are also part of it. The overall feeling of this game is dark, and has a very grey and moody atmosphere to match. Then add in the massive colossi that the player has to climb over to defeat. It’s a great blend of both the epic monsters that the player is battling, and a wide open spaces. Shadow of the Colossus is not a happy game, and it does a great job of dragging the player along in a beautiful but depressing world.
Fallout blends futuristic technology with 1950s Aermicana, and people love it. It’s a very interesting clash of new and old, and remains one of the more unique series in gaming because of it. There is something wholly unique about walking around a nuclear savaged world while at the same time feeling like you’ve stepped out of a Norman Rockwell painting. This blend is compelling, and allows Fallout to shine.
Kingdom Hearts doesn’t just have one setting, but rather a multitude of many interesting places. Kingdom Hearts gives gamers the wonderful chance to play in a few of their favorite Disney worlds. Each world has it’s own unique look and feel, even the main characters will change at times. With such distinct worlds it helps to keep the game interesting. The jungles of Tarzan feel completely different from the darkness of Halloween Town. It helps to immerse the gamer as well as give a heaping helping of nostalgia.
It’s safe to say in the realm of games, that I have not really played anything else like The Novelist. It follows the Kaplan family as they stay in a house during the summer. Dan is the main character and a novelist, his wife is a stay at home mother and artist, and their son is starting to grow up and develop as a child. Each character has a big problem. Dan is starting to really struggle with his writing, especially with his current book. The wife wants to desperately get back into the art world, and is thinking about leaving Dan. Their son is struggling in school and starting to feel like he doesn’t belong in the family. You as the gamer play an unknown force that moves around the house and is trying to influence what happens to the family.
Each week a situation will arise. Each member of the family will have what they want to happen. You discover this by looking for clues around the house, and reading the memories of the three people. Once you have discovered what each of them want, you then get to choose the outcome. So for instance the wife’s grandmother dies. She wants the husband to come to the funeral. That same week the husband is asked to give an interview about his book. The son that week also wants to go to an air show. If you choose to have the husband go to the funeral that means the husband and son will be disappointed. You can also pick a compromise in these situations so that at least one other character will get part of what they want, but one of the three will always be let down.
It requires you to really balance how much effort you put into satisfying each character. You can in fact focus on the family, but this means that Dan’s book will suffer and you can even get an ending where he gives up writing all together. On the other hand the book could be your focus, but the wife might leave Dan as a result. Balance is the key word to trying to please everyone.
There are two gameplay modes, story and stealth. In story the spirit can free roam to look for clues and read memories because the Kaplan’s can not see it. In stealth you have to actually stay out of sight, if you are caught the game ends and picks up from the last save. Stealth doesn’t really seem needed to me. It adds challenge, but The Novelist isn’t really about the gameplay as much as it’s about the story of the family. Stealth just doesn’t add that much to me.
The other issue I have with the game is that some of the desires vs compromises just seem a bit silly. One week the son’s reading will start to suffer, while the husband wants alone time, and the wife wants more family time. If you choose the son it says that every morning Dan, and his wife sit down with the son, tutor and spend time with him. Yet somehow the wife can still end up angry that the family isn’t doing anything together that summer. Little moments like that clearly don’t make sense.
Despite those few moments the game is still really interesting. Trying to get a “perfect” ending (good ending for all three characters) became a bit of an obsession of mine because every time one of the characters would suffer I honestly felt for them. You want the Kaplan’s to be happy, and you can relate to them. There is also something to be said for experimenting with the endings. What happens if you just focus completely on the son? Can Dan be happy even if he stops writing? It is also fairly harsh, there is a certain reality that has to be faced, that the entire family cannot get everything they want.
The game is not perfect, as mentioned stealth seems completely unneeded, and a few of the compromises make no sense. It is still very interesting and has a vast number of different outcomes to keep it worth playing multiple times. If story driven games are something you enjoy I would highly recommend it.
We may be a little late to the party on this DLC, but we have finally experienced it. Trials of Gnomus is the newest DLC for Plants vs Zombies Garden Warfare 2. The main feature of the DLC is community events. Now PvZ has already played around with this feature in the past. They have given a few events for the community to work on, like everyone getting a total number of healing, or fire kills. Trials of Gnomus takes it a step further. In addition to those types of events it also has random gameplay types.
So far we have seen Dinos vs Cats. In this you take over the Dinos and Cats from the infinity gameplay and do sudden death team vs team matches. There are also boss hunts, as well as just random plays on standard gameplay types (for instance team vanquish where you don’t pick what character you respawn as). To reward people for this they have introduced a new star system, rainbow stars. Each time one of these events is happening you get stars for participating and can open a 10 star, 30, star, and 50 star chest.
All of this is really fun, and a very smart way to keep their community coming back. It’s a huge ‘hey everyone make sure you are signing into PvZGW2 regularly to get to play these new game types and get special rewards. The execution leaves a little to be desired however.
First and foremost the events themselves are inconsistent at best. While they claim to have a calendar that helps with this, it’s been unreliable. Second they are very short lived, with no consideration for the fact that the community itself is so diverse. If you want a game that reaches all ages, and want to encourage that community then power to you. Realize however doing these events in the middle of the week when many people can’t participate is not wise. Also making them all only 3 days long, which then requires people to be very dedicated during those 3 days, can be rough. To add to that the servers are clearly not able to handle the events themselves. While normally play is only partially affected when these events happen, the events themselves are shaky. If you are even able to get into one of them (and that is a big if) you will still have to contend with drops, and major bugs.
Lastly many of the events sort of require that you come with your own friends/community to play with. Boss hunt is hard, even on normal it’s extremely challenging. Attempting it with random players is an exercise in madness. You still get a descent star reward for participating at all, but it would be nice to be able to win without having to work out bringing in your own people. Especially given again how random the events are, and that they don’t last very long.
In the end my solution is simple. Make the events last longer, and have a shorter down time in between. It shouldn’t be 3 days of an event and then a week off. It should be closer to 3-5 days for an event then 1-3 days off. Keep them coming, keep them consistent. Next drop the difficulty on the events that pit players against AI. Normal boss hunt should not be as challenging as garden ops on hard (or even crazy). Lastly, and probably the most important, make sure your servers can actually support this.
Otherwise there is not a lot to say. I am a fan. It’s a great way to keep the community involved. The rewards are worth going for. The events are interesting enough, and it does effectively keep me coming back to the game to play more.
Xbox and PlayStation have both released the games you will be able to get for free in November 2016. If you are a PlayStation Plus member and/or Xbox Live member here are the games you can get for free next month.
Super Dungeon Bros: November 1st-30th
Murdered: Soul Suspect: November 16th- December 15th
Monkey Island SE: November 1st- November 15th
Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon: November 16th- November 30th
Everybody’s Gone to the Rapture
The Deadly Tower of Monsters
Costume Quest 2
Letter Quest Remastered
The phrase “you can’t judge a book by it’s cover” would translate fairly well to my hesitation to watch this film. It came highly recommended to me by Netflix (a hit or miss recommendation at best). Due to my knowing almost nothing about it, the description of the movie, and the pictures used for it I brushed it off. It seemed like a fairly standard slasher flick. Now I don’t mean to be a horror movie snob, I am not. I love a good dumb but fun slasher flick every once in awhile, but they don’t tend to get me excited. Now that I’ve gotten to see this movie, I wish I hadn’t waited so long.
The Invitation feels more like a character piece than a horror film. The main character, Will and his current significant other have been invited to a dinner party held by his ex wife, Eden. He is uncomfortable with the idea of going, and there are slow hints that this is more than just a lack of desire to spend the evening with an ex. As they arrive at the house he begins to have flash backs, and slowly the full story is revealed. Eden and Will had a son who died in an accident, and the two fell apart as a result. Eden becomes suicidal and is sent to get help, where she meets her current husband. Will manages to hold it together more on the outside, but inside he is plagued with guilt and doesn’t actually want to move on, believing it would be betraying his son. Both have become isolated from their friends, and this dinner party is the first time the group has gotten together in two years.
Will’s story is told largely in a series of flashbacks. He slowly moves around the house remembering everything from happy moments, to the actual loss of his son. He does not cope well with being back in the house he once lived in (and where he lost his child). It begins to manifest in anger and paranoia towards Eden and her husband. Will believes that there is some other reason that out of the blue Eden has called them all together.
Eden’s story is slowly revealed during the party. The group she went to is actually part of a cult called “The Invitation”. Through it she has let go of her pain, but it’s clear she is not exactly the woman they all remember. The cult itself is rather unnerving to the group, as are Eden’s new friends that she met while away.
As the movie unfolds it’s rather unclear if Will is actually going mad from his guilt and memories, or if he is right to suspect that Eden is a danger to them. The movie builds a large amount of tension, as no side is presented as being together. For everything that Will finds proving that Eden and her husband are a danger, Will does something that proves that he is unhinged. The group is stuck in the middle trying to help a grieving Will, but stay supportive of their old friend. It makes it all the more challenging as the characters reveal themselves to be good people, and rather loving. It’s a horror movie so you know something is going to happen, but the movie manages to keep you on edge until it does.
It’s a slow pace, suspenseful character driven story that explodes in a rather big climax. I have complained about movies doing this before, as it is very easy to mess up. The Invitation manages to pull it off extremely well. When things finally start to happen it’s fast, dramatic, horrific, and rather depressing. What is going on doesn’t completely come as a surprise, while the movie does try to present you with two paths it’s fairly easy to pick out the one that it will come to. This is not a complaint, the movie does a great job keeping you entertained until that point. It also manages to get one more last shocking moment in right at the end.
Aside from the story and pacing being on point everything else flows together to help. The acting is solid, each character fitting their roles well. The cinematography fits well with the story, with a few interesting shots that help drive the drama. What really got me was the way that sound is used. There is almost no non-diegetic sounds or music used at any point in the film. It becomes rather jarring at various points, and keeps the viewer in the moment. When the movie needs to build tension it uses the characters and their surroundings to do so instead of a tense soundtrack, and it can be highly effective.
This film won’t make you scream, but it will stay with you. It’s haunting, incredibly well done, and suspenseful. It is certainly one of the best modern horror films I have seen, and is worth a watch.
Overall I would say I am not a fan of the never ending horror sequel. A lot of decent movies are undercut by their sequels, or even decent franchises get bogged down in too many movies. Despite this every once in awhile a horror sequel comes along and is truly worth it. While they aren’t generally as good as the original, they do manage to get close enough to be worth a watch or two.
Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors
We are going to jump right over Nightmare 2 because it’s awful. Dream Warriors earns it’s spot not for being a great horror film, but rather for being a great comedy masquerading as a horror film. The first Nightmare movie had a strange balance of horror and making you laugh at situations that probably shouldn’t have been funny. 3 leans into that and leans hard. This is easily the funniest in the series, and does so unapologetically. It also manages to still be pretty brutal and horrifying at times.
Hellbound: Hellraiser II
Hellraiser quickly goes down as a series, in fact even this movie is pushing it. That being said Hellraiser is open ended enough that the sequel is nice. Kirsty’s entire family has been brutally murdered at the end of the first movie, and the Cenobites kind of leave, but in all honesty they still desperately want her. It’s sequel fodder to the max. Kirsty must once again fight against the Cenobites as well as the actual bad guys, people attempting to control them. This movie ramps up the gore, but doesn’t manage to have as solid of a story. It’s still creepy, and fairly horrifying. It’s also the only sequel in the series that I consider anything more than a joke that no one else is in on.
The Devil’s Rejects
This movie gets the distinct honor of being much better than the first (in my opinion). The Devil’s Rejects is fairly stand alone, while it is a sequel to House of 1000 Corpses, you can skip that movie. Where I felt House of 1000 Corpses was an unfocused gore fest, Devil’s Rejects is well, a focused gore fest. The movie is still in your face, brutal, and can be a bit too much. It’s also entertaining, and those of us that love messed up horror movies will have more than a few moments to enjoy.
Continuing the trend of the second movie being the only passable sequel, we come to Jaws. Jaws was a very clever movie, with a lot of different intense moments. It ends with the humans being completely trapped with just the shark, and that intensity is what Jaws 2 hopes to replicate. Skipping a lot of the build up, Jaws 2 jumps straight into a group of humans being stranded in the water with the shark hunting them. It’s effective, though not as entertaining. In fact that is the bottom line with this movie, everything about it is close to what Jaws was, but falls just a bit short. It’s not a horrible sequel, and it’s certainly better than anything else in the series.
I debated between Scream 2 and Scream 4. Ultimately I decided on Scream 4 because it manages to capture the feel that Scream had almost completely. In fact Scream 4 is arguably not a sequel, and if anything it helps the movie. It’s desire to be something wholly unique, one part sequel, on part reboot, one part new movie, manages to work well for it. It honors the first while still pushing forward to be it’s own thing. At the end of the day Scream 4 is really just Scream next generation, and that is a good thing.
Dawn of the Dead
I debated whether or not to include this, based solely on the fact that I don’t know that it really counts as a sequel. The “of the Dead” series are more like stand alone movies centered around zombies than an actual series of sequels. That being said if you go on the loosest definition of sequels it is one, and it’s a great one. The movie does what a lot of horror sequels do and boosts the horror, gore, and action. However, it manages to do so without losing much. It’s still a clever, horrific, well told zombie movie. It wouldn’t call it better than Night of the Living Dead, but it’s darn close.
A good setting is vital to a video game. While good gameplay can carry a game, a great environment with that gameplay takes it that next step. When talking about in game worlds there are so many different ones that deserve credit. It’s almost impossible to narrow down the list to just a few. The following are a few that deserve credit, in the horror genre, as being some of the best worlds to be explored by gamers. Whether impressive in their size, detail, or just aesthetically appealing these worlds are great to explore.
While it doesn’t have the most unique gameplay, Dante’s Inferno does really shine in it’s environment. This game does a great job interpreting the epic poem about an artist’s journey through hell. Each one of the levels has a unique look to it and paints a vivid picture of what that level of hell is supposed to represent. Lust is stormy, Greed covered in rivers of melted gold, and Treachery portrays an icy world. Aside from the levels themselves Inferno also highlights other features mentioned in the poem, like the rivers of blood, and individual parts of the larger levels. Inferno can be disturbing, and it’s no surprise that it made people uncomfortable. However, if you are going to take a work of literature and put it into a game it’s the details that are important. Inferno doesn’t turn away from being disturbing, it is supposed to be an interpretation of hell. Instead it embraces it and makes a dark and screwed up environment. It’s worth playing to experience seeing the poem brought to life.
The Ishimura is one of the scariest game environments that many gamers have ever played in. It’s dark, bloody, and terrifying. The setting can make or break a horror game, and in the case of Dead Space the Ishimura makes it. Gamers feel isolated and trapped within The Ishimura not wanting to go further, but being forced to. Add in the awesome moments of being in space and they’ve created a recipe for a setting that is both awesome and scary.
While Bioshock borrowed gameplay elements from the System Shock series, the world it’s set in is brand new. Rapture is a brilliant mix of art deco and sci-fi elements, it’s very easy to get sucked into this game. The Bioshock franchise hasn’t stopped with that game. The follow up managed to expand on Rapture, while honoring what made it so amazing in the first place. Infinite took gamers out of Rapture and into another setting, this time in the sky instead of under the sea.
In large part Silent Hill gets it’s place because it’s impossible to think of horror “locations” without thinking of Silent Hill. A town shaped by tragedy that has seen better days, and the Otherworld of Silent Hill. Corroded, dark, and filled with enemies that just want to see you die. There is so much about Silent Hill to hate, and yet we as gamers love it. The older games were masters of atmosphere with the fog, lighting, and feeling that you would never actually be safe.
A strong environment feels especially important in horror games. Alan Wake may have mixed reviews for it’s actual gameplay, but the setting is truly scary. Darkness surrounds the world of Alan Wake, and the isolated town is finely detailed. Be it the actual town that reminds the gamer of Twin Peaks, or the forests, or the ultra creepy corn fields, Alan Wake keeps the gamer in an interesting and ultra creepy environment. This dark atmosphere serves this game well, adding to the fear and holding the player in.
Eternal Darkness moves the player through many different characters, settings, and even times. It’s a terrifying game that challenges players to push themselves through a game with challenging enemies and puzzles, as well as an unforgiving sanity meter. The icing on the cake to make this game horrifying is the settings. They are all dark and richly detailed. The Cathedral especially stands out for gamers as being a terrifying setting in the game. Eternal Darkness fills its environment, with blood, bodies, and a dark atmosphere. Having such a terrifying environment is part of what makes gamers feel so trapped. This is a key element in horror games and Eternal Darkness does not disappoint.
If you are a gamer it’s likely you noticed that people were freaking out the last few days, or you yourself were doing a little bit of it. Rockstar in a stroke of brilliance teased out the announcement for Red Dead Redemption 2. They started with a simple picture of the Rockstar logo in red, as was used for Red Dead Redemption. The following day a silhouette of 7 characters on a background reminiscent of RDR was released. Today they announced Red Dead Redemption 2, and it’s a little disappointing. First and foremost why Red Dead Redemption 2? The series has been Red Dead Revolver, Red Dead Redemption, and now Red Dead Redemption 2? The argument could be made that it’s a direct tie-in with Red Dead Redemption, however the picture today doesn’t really confirm that. The center character does not look like Jack Marston, and it’s clearly not John. It could still be tied to John’s story, it’s still underwhelming. Why not Red Dead Retribution? Another disappointing thing is once again no women characters are featured. Rockstar has gotten a lot of flack for their lack of playable women, and for the most part they have brushed this off. I was waiting to make a comment on this matter until I knew that whatever was coming next for RDR wouldn’t feature a woman. While it’s still not confirmed, it is pretty telling that there are seven featured characters and none of them are women.
All of this being said I am still rather excited for this news. Red Dead Redemption was an amazing game, and I am glad that the series still has life. I’ve always been in the minority of gamers that has preferred Rockstar’s other open-world games over Grand Theft Auto. It will be interesting to see what where this game goes, and how it ties into John’s story while still standing on its own. The game was announced for Fall 2017, and there is a trailer expected later this week. So for the time being, I will not attempt to speculate or comment beyond this. I am very excited to bring more news as it unfolds, and hope that it’s good news.
Inside is the follow up to Playdead’s very popular, Limbo. Inside takes a lot of the themes from Limbo but re-purposes them enough to make it feel fresh, and not just like Limbo 2.0. Like Limbo the game has a monochromatic look. Everything is in black and white with just a few splashes of color that appear here and there. It is also a 2.5 platformer with a strong focus on puzzles. Beyond that Inside manages to make a name for itself and rise up to be an amazing follow-up to Limbo.
The story is given in subtle hints and leaves more questions than answers. This is something that Playdead fans should expect. You control a boy who starts in the woods then works his way through various locations. The people he encounters are either a) zombie like people with no free will or b) those controlling everyone from group a. The boy appears to have a certain level of free will making him a target for various people. Beyond just the normal human enemies the boy must escape dogs, as well as a few unknown beings.
The puzzle system is solid. The puzzles range in their variety and difficulty. Some will come to you rather easily, others might take many experiments before you get it right. Beyond that, no two puzzles really felt the same. There were similar aspects to them, but there was always something new, something unique, that helped shape each one. The end result is that everything remains fresh.
I contemplated whether to give this game a mini review or it’s own piece, but it’s sort of hard to discuss at length without debating the philosophy behind the entire game. The ending is disturbing and confusing, and the alternate ending just adds to it. The game is dark, creepy, scary at times, but clever and unique. It remained entertaining from start to finish, all though a bit short. I highly recommend it.
Lately I have seen a number of articles and videos that include statements claiming that point and click is not a genre normally associated with horror. I won’t point them out because I don’t wish to bad mouth these people directly. In fairness if you do bring up point and click games a large number of gamers will go straight to LucasArts games or more comedic titles. That being said point and click and horror have gone hand and hand for a number of years. I thought it might be nice to discuss some of the best point and click horror games you can play.
I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream
Any chance that I have to talk about this underrated gem I take. I Have No Mouth is based on an older short story. The writer of the short story was the writer for the game (as well as a voice actor). The game does go pretty far from the story itself, but due to the writer being involved in both it keeps the same feeling, tone, and overall message intact. The game is dark, disturbing, and challenging. It’s not only the player that is being forced to deal with the horrific events, but the characters themselves can also be negatively impacted by what’s around them, thus changing the outcome of the game. It’s all at once horrific and beautiful.
You play as lead character Gabriel Knight (never saw that coming) who is an owner of a bookstore. He discovers that he is meant to be a Shadow Hunter. The series unfolds as mystery horror games. Each one shows different cases that Gabriel must solve. While going through the games Gabriel is haunted by a number of terrifying things. From nightmares to actual enemies. It’s a dark but well done series.
Dark Seed features a normal world and then a “dark” world that is directly base on work by H.R. Giger. When you start with “inspired by Giger” you can only go to truly dark, horrific, but oddly beautiful places. The story itself follows Mike Dawson as he attempts to stop the dark world from over taking the normal world. The challenge of the game is that the clock is often unforgiving. So the game is sort of in a limbo between being a great point and click game and an unforgiving one.
It’s hard to sum up the entire series into a nice description. Many of the games are directly related to one another, but the stories themselves are challenging and far reaching. It is an impressive series, and went on to make a number of great spin offs as well. They are challenging, fear inspiring, and down right horrific at times. The series has taken inspiration from a number of other figures in horror, including (but not limited to) Dario Argento. It’s a great series, and a rather popular one that people often forget is a sign of how well point and click works together.
Decay- The Mare
Moving into more modern horror point and click we have Decay- The Mare. This is another often overlooked but surprisingly pleasing horror game. It manages to build a lot of suspense and tension, making gamers almost want to stop solving puzzles because of what they will be faced with. Once you reach the end of the game and discover the secrets behind the horror it also stands out as one of the more unique horror games I’ve ever played.
The Cat Lady
This game is not always classified as point and click, but I feel it really does belong there. It is a hard game to play. I don’t mean in that it is challenging, but that it is emotionally draining, forces gamers to deal with a large number of difficult subjects, and is just… hard. Despite that it’s also terrifying, and terrifyingly beautiful. It has a unique art style, and will stand out as one of the best games I’ve played in recent years.
These are by no means the only point and click horror games out there, they aren’t even all the good ones. However, they do paint a rather large picture of the two genres’ relationship. While again it’s easy to go straight to mystery or humor with point and click, it has had a pretty strong relationship with horror in the past. The modern revival of the point and click genre has a strong leaning towards horror, especially with indie games. So get out there and explore, you’ll find some pretty incredible point and click horror games.
There are plenty of horror games that keep us on the edge of our seat. They thrill us, scare us, and bring us oh so much delight. Occasionally though games come along that bring us those same feelings despite the fact that they aren’t really horror games at all. Here are a few games that bring the scary without being in the horror genre.
For a game that is all about getting supplies and building your world, Minecraft can get a little intense. The truth is what is “scary” about Minecraft is that death seems to be waiting for you around every corner. While gathering resources it’s hard to balance constantly going back to a safe place to store supplies and continue on your questing. The consequences for death is losing everything that you’ve gathered, and it carries a rather harsh sting with it. Add in that the enemies are fairly scary in their own right (creepers, zombies, endermen) and you have a game that brings an intense fear, despite not being horror at all. Eventually you get used to Minecraft though, the loss of supplies stops carrying such a heavy weight, and then they upgrade the game and something new comes along to bring a bit of fear.
Metal Gear Series
MGS has a few moments in the game that make it at the very least creepy. Psycho Mantis stands out as one of those. Perhaps over time his tricks don’t hold the fear they once had, but at launch it could really creep people out. Beyond this simple boss battle there are still other moments (like the death hall) that feel slightly misplaced and rather terrifying. Going further into the series you will still have these random moments, including more disturbing boss fights, and scenes that get player’s hearts racing. MGS also deserves a nod because the actual plot itself can be down right unnerving.
Red Dead Redemption
First I am going to say that this is not including the Undead Nightmare DLC which in it’s own right belongs in the horror genre. Taking just the base game there is one aspect that manages to bring jump scares more than once, the animals. Riding around and BAM cougar. Walking along to skin an animal and BAM snake. The animals are these background “enemies” for the most part and yet they manage to bring a fair number of jump scares and intense moments of “don’t die, don’t die”. It also doesn’t hurt that animals usually warn you when they are stalking you. Instead of thinking “oh I hear a cougar better move on” it’s more of a panic inducing moment.
Halo gets it’s “scary” because of one thing, The Flood. Halo starts off as a fairly interesting but standard FPS game then going along and suddenly a new enemy. The Flood is basically zombie like beings that make their appearance in the Halo series and brings a little scariness to the sci-fi games. While they aren’t enough to really push the series into the horror genre The Flood brings many aspects from horror games. They are bloody, creepy, and usually have more than one jump scare along with them.
Much like The Flood from Halo, Fallout bring zombie like enemies with Feral Ghouls. In most of the series they aren’t that bad, Fallout 3 deserves a special mention because of the Metros. The metro is extremely easy to get lost in, dark, creepy, and full of Feral Ghouls. While overall Fallout 3 is not worth calling a horror game… those damn metros.
Half Life 2
I am hard pressed to believe that this game isn’t actually classified as horror, but it seems to escape that according to most. First, there is Ravenholm, a truly nightmarish level that will leave the best of gamers more than a little scared. It is filled with headcrabs and zombies, and while you can race through, going off the beaten path will help you discover more but also give you more scares. Even outside Ravenholm though the game still brings the creepy. Zombies and other various enemies will still find you, and when you start to feel like you are out of the “horror” part of the game something will happen and you are right back in it.
Dragon Age Origins
There are a few points where this game crosses into down right creepy. The Deep Roads are probably where it goes full blown scary though. It has scary enemies, and if that isn’t enough the voice over of the poem will leave many quaking in their boots.
Hespith repeats this poem:
First day, they come and catch everyone.
Second day, they beat us and eat some for meat.
Third day, the men are all gnawed on again.
Fourth day, we wait and fear for our fate.
Fifth day, they return and it’s another girl’s turn.
Sixth day, her screams we hear in our dreams.
Seventh day, she grew as in her mouth they spew.
Eighth day, we hated as she is violated.
Ninth day, she grins and devours her kin.
Now she does feast, as she’s become the beast.
Now you lay and wait, for their screams will haunt you in your dreams.
The Legend of Zelda: Majora’s Mask
The Legend of Zelda is a totally kid and adult friendly adventure game. Majora’s Mask seems to start getting more than a little twisted though. First and foremost the plot itself is creepy, and along the way there are some “super fun” enemies like the Gibdo (mummies), and Wallmaster. It’s creepy, has it’s fair share of jump scares, and more then a few intense moments. Majora’s Mask almost feels like kid friendly horror.
Batman Arkham Asylum
You can probably boil down most of the “horror” in this game to the morgue part specifically. During that time in the game you will be faced with Scarecrow and his many way’s of trying to get into Batman’s mind. However, I think the overall game carries with it a bit of a “horror” feel. It’s dark, the inmates having taken over the Asylum is rather unnerving, and once you leave the morgue you are never totally free of the after effects. Next to Half-Life 2 this game to me is the top contender on the list for maybe just being able to add horror as a sub genre.
When I first realized there was a sequel to SLC Punk, my reaction was not a positive one. If I were to make a list of movies that did not need a sequel SLC Punk would be on it. However, after some reflection I realized it wasn’t fair for me to say the movie was bad without watching it. So I watched it, and I was surprised. It was actually worse than I thought it would be. I went in expecting a half cocked rip off of the original movie. Instead I got something that felt like poorly written fanfiction brought to life. I realize that is harsh, but it’s rather hard not to be harsh about the movie.
The movie follows the story of Heroine Bob’s apparent son. Bob plays an after life narrator for the movie, commenting on his son being lost and needing to grow. His son goes off on an “adventure” with two friends. It is a fairly standard coming of age indie movie plot, just with awkward pacing. While this is happening Bob also narrates a side adventure with the kid’s mom and important friends of his. In fact Bob also talks about how these adult characters were all major features in his life despite them not being part of the original. It attempts to shoe horn in their importance to Bob’s life which just felt awkward and further points out how disconnected this movie is from the original.
Bob’s son and his friends are forgettable and pretty hard to empathize with. The side story following the mother and Bob’s “friends” is forgettable and doesn’t belong. The pacing is weak, and every connection to the original feels entirely forced. Ultimately that is the problem. On it’s own this is a sub-par coming of age story with forgettable characters. Add forcing a connection to a movie that it has no business being associated with just makes it sub-par AND muddled. I hate being this negative (unless something is actually offensive), but I simply can’t find much positive to say about this movie.
Horror movies are constantly being made. It’s a great money making genre, and horror movie fans are pretty devoted. However, lately the trend has been fewer original horror movies and more reboots or remakes. It seems to have really kicked off with Rob Zombie’s remake of Halloween (some did exist before then), and has continued to go from there. Now while there have been a few good ones, for the most part this has meant a market bogged down in mediocre or just plain bad horror movie remakes. Here is a list of reasons why it needs to stop.
WARNING THIS WILL CONTAIN SPOILERS
The reboot/remake often forgets what makes the first so great in the first place: biggest offender Friday the 13th
One of the problems with the remakes/reboots is that often ignore what made people love the orginal. A perfect example of this is Friday the 13th remake from 2009. What really made the original Friday the 13th stand out is the identity of the killer. Since the creation of the final girl horror movies we’ve seen tons of them. Friday the 13th series, Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween… the list goes on. What Friday the 13th had was the fact that the masked killer was not in fact who you thought it was. It was not Jason, but rather Jason’s mother. It was surprising, clever, and actually made this movie stand out in it’s genre.
Along comes the remake and aside from being mediocre in every other way it decides to skip the grand reveal that the killer is Jason’s mom and just make it Jason. It’s boring, predictable, completely bypassed the one moment of “wow that’s pretty unique” that the original had. Maybe the excuse is we all know that Jason’s mom is the killer, but then again wasn’t this remake supposed to be for a new generation? Not only that, but even knowing that Jason’s mom is the killer doesn’t completely ruin the experience of the original Friday the 13th. The fact is the unique killer is arguably one of the most important things about Friday the 13th so why ignore that?
The changes to the killers are usually not successful: biggest offenders Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street
Rob Zombie, as mentioned, really kicked off this trend with Halloween. He took a unique approach to his remake and really wanted to look at that character of Michael Meyers. I give Rob Zombie credit for thinking outside the box, but the end result is just not that good. Part of what made John Carpenter’s Halloween so brilliant was that Meyers was this unknown killer. He was some random kid that seemed to live a normal life until he killed his sister. He is then sent away and described as pure evil. Meyer’s doesn’t have much of a reason for stalking and killing the teens that night. The biggest connection he seems to have is that Laurie just happens to stroll up to his house while he’s in there. He kills because he can, it’s as simple as that.
Zombie takes the time to really go into Meyer’s past. Shows him as an abused and troubled boy that doesn’t just snap, but snaps because of all the hardship he faces. The thing is the numerous Halloween sequels that came before this remake already tried that. They desperately tried to give a connection between Meyers and Laurie. It wasn’t needed then, and it’s not needed now. Zombie simply repeats what has already been done, he desperately tries to make Meyers into a complex character. Meyers was never more scary than when he was just a faceless killer with no motivation. Just like the sequels seemed to miss that, Zombie did too. I give Zombie credit for trying, but the end result is rather dull.
Wes Craven was a pro at bringing a macabre sense of humor to his movies. Freddy is the perfect example of that. He is a scary villain, one that was horrible in life, and can now channel the power of dreams to torture in death. Yet despite all this Freddy is really rather hilarious. He is one bad pun after another which really challenges the viewer to laugh while watching something horrific. It’s more than a little twisted, but it’s ultimately successful. It keeps the Nightmare on Elm Street series from being the same as the other slasher flicks.
The remake once again suffers from the desperate need for more backstory and character development for Freddy. You get a closer look at what makes Freddy, Freddy, but in the process the charm of the original character is completely lost. Freddy as a villain might be a little more twisted, but then he’s just as forgettable as the next guy because he’s been done before. The movie totally ignored what made Freddy popular, I mean the new guy makes all of one pun. Honestly Freddy’s new development is forgettable, and I find myself just wanting the old Freddy.
They think more gore is really the solution: biggest offenders, pretty much all of them
The true problem with many of the remakes is how lazy they seem. Little effort is put into making it something that still honors the classic but has it’s own voice. It’s not like remakes like The Thing (1982) where the overall theme is used but a new and wonderful plot is brought to it. No, instead they find the basic plot and then just cover it in more gore. The Hills Have Eyes focused a lot less on the emotional trauma to the characters, but had a lot more gore. Carrie doesn’t really look into the emotional break down of this girl with a slow build up to a climax, but there is a lot more gore. The Last House on the Left lost all the complex reflection but…, well you get the point.
It’s a system built on being able to make a lot of the movies quickly, and easily. Friday the 13th is the final girl movie on a lake, killer with a hockey mask, buckets of blood. Replace lake with suburbia, and the mask and you have Halloween. The fact of the matter is though gore does not make a movie scary it makes it gory. But making a movie gory with jump scares is a lot easier than really trying to work out the plot. At the end of the day it’s a sad system that just leaves classics covered in fake blood.
One of the best possible reboots wasn’t really a reboot, and others that have tried the same have failed
As I mentioned in the introduction I won’t say that all remakes are bad. In fact one of the best exists in a world of remake/reboot/sequel, and that is shockingly Scream 4. The confused nature of what this movie is probably lends itself to the success. Instead of being a straight up reboot it’s kind of a sequel that follows reboot rules. Doing this keeps it close enough to the original while still giving it room to breath. It manages to do what Scream did all those years before. It breaks down the rules of horror (now changed for the new generation), has an interesting cast of characters, and the killer reveal that is a little shocking. The movie works so well because it hangs between a sequel and reboot, pull out the sequel aspects and it would have been a failure. It would have been a boring remake of a movie that we didn’t need.
This sort of blend between sequel and reboot was attempted with Texas Chainsaw 3D. It fails because it’s less of a sequel and more of a lazy reboot. First while being a pretty much direct sequel to Texas Chainsaw Massacre (or so it claims) the amount of time that has gone by completely breaks the timeline. More than 20 years have actually gone by, and yet the movie tries to make you believe it’s just been a few. Aside from that horrible oversight the whole plot is turned on it’s head. Leatherface is not the abused killer from a messed up family. No, the people outside the family were really the bad guys and Leatherface is a hero of sorts? I mean there is more to it than that, but it’s not worth analyzing. It attempts to find the success of blending sequel and reboot, but fails. When attempting to mimic the success of other movies it’s important to pay attention to all the aspects that created that success.
At the end of the day we get a few gems of remakes/reboots. We even have a few passable ones. With the world so bogged down with so many remakes however it’s hard to sort through them to find the ones worth watching. So unless a movie is going to really actually try to honor the source material but still find it’s own voice, it just needs to not happen.
The numbers are in and The Magnificent Seven did well overall. It managed to take the number one spot and bring in $35 million. That is a fairly large number, though a bit on the low side considering it’s budget. However, given the movie’s content and genre this is right where it needs to be. A solid opening weekend followed by consistent numbers is what will make this movie a success, and it seems well on it’s way to pulling that off. Sully dropped down to third place though it still performing admirably. Blair Witch made a massive drop down to number six, falling just shy of the $4 million mark.
1: The Magnificent Seven
4: Bridget Jones’s Baby
6: Blair Witch
7: Don’t Breathe
8: Suicide Squad
9: When the Bough Breaks
10: Kubo and the Two Strings
There have been a lot of articles/videos/opinion pieces, etc put out discussing some of the problematic areas in the gaming industry. Discussing things from sexism, racism, and violence. In response to this there have been a lot of groups that have come out in full force demanding that these opinion pieces need not be shared and are bad for the industry.
I have two things I would like to state to the reader before moving on. One, I disagree with polarizing opinions of any kind (something I will discuss more further down). Two, that I don’t want to make another article discussing the specific problems. Rather I want this to be about why I think discussing these problems is good, why the debate is needed.
The truth is there are troubling aspects of the game industry. They range from the content in games, the hiring practices of companies, to the behavior of gamers themselves. Are the people writing about games truly unbiased? Is it right to raise money via Kickstarter to make videos about the gaming industry? Are game companies not hiring enough women, or is it more a problem with education and girls not pursuing these jobs? Are video games sexist? Racist? Do intentions matter when making something sexist or racist? These are valid and important questions, and these are valid and important questions that are going to be asked regardless of who is asking them.
In the 1990s there were massive debates over the video game industry, and specifically violence in the industry. Notably absent from these debates were gamers. Politicians and people with little to no connection to gaming controlled the conversation. They controlled it so well and so effectively that the industry created the ESRB in order to avoid massive censorship of video games. It was a rating system put in place quickly and comprehensively in order to stop politicians from ultimately killing games. The discussion was happening, it just wasn’t open for gamers to really control the way it went.
That is the important difference now. All forms of media, from art to video games, have these massive discussions about content and the viewer. The great debate over what is art is still waged. And what does it say about the consumers of art when they have certain reactions. Books went through government bans and are still facing bans in schools based on content. Movies and TVs will never escape the discussion of their role in American lives. All of this media also has many discussions about racism and sexism. The important part is that those creating this media, and those consuming it, have an active part in the discussion. It is not controlled by those that want to silence them.
Gamers are finally in a position where they can directly control the debate. The debates will happen, most of the population of America plays games in some capacity. The likelihood that games will be the only popular media that some how escapes question is pretty much slim to none. Even if we could, why would we want to? Don’t we want to talk about these issues and make sure that games, those writing about them, those playing them, and those designing them continue to improve and bring positive changes to the industry?
The debates will happen though. Games have moved to rival the most popular forms of entertainment and media so there is no escaping them. So isn’t it better that the debates are happening with gamers? That the questions are being raised by gamers? That gamers have a chance to answer and a chance to guide and direct the conversation, if not the answers themselves. We are no longer sitting on the sidelines while politicians threaten mass censorship, we are front and center. In fact when outsiders get too far into the debates they are usually turned away or at least told to take a back seat to those in the know.
Yes, part of opening the debate does come with a negative. It opens the debate to those that want to take a polarizing viewpoint in order to cause drama and gain money from it. They are the ones that demand that the industry is only problematic without discussion, or that people need to just shut up because there is nothing wrong. Make no mistake these people are two sides to the same coin. They exist in a realm of controversial statements without any real discussion. These people don’t need to control the debate though, in fact they don’t need to be invited to it.
Let’s let those that talk about the need for more representation in games but acknowledge the progress the industry has made control it. Let those who talk about the lack of women in the industry but have real solutions and don’t just blame the industry itself control the debate. Let the vast majority of gamers who see the problems, still enjoy games, and have no wish to drive other gamers out control it.
The debate is important because it’s going to happen. These issues won’t just go away because people don’t want to discuss them. Video games have made it, it is popular entertainment now. Part of making it means that these issues will be looked at under a microscope. Not every gamer has to participate, if you don’t want to then don’t, simple as that. But don’t try to argue that we need to silence those bringing it up. Race, sexism, who is playing games, who is making games, what influence games have on people, all of these things won’t go away. The difference is now we as gamers have the chance to control the tone. We don’t have to sit by, we don’t have to desperately create something like the ESRB in order to stop people from stealing it from us. Keep the debate going, and decide who gets to be involved. Silence the polarizing people, and instead support those calmly discussing the issues with an open mind and solutions. Support the developers that want to see the industry move forward. Question those writing about games to keep them honest about what they are doing.
Embrace and enjoy the debate. Enjoy that gamers are no longer looked down on or subject to losing our voice should we choose not to. Acknowledge the problems, but still enjoy your games. And if you want to then involve yourself in the discussion.
I am a huge fan of animated shows (for adults), and often times they get written off as just being another Family Guy or South Park. Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying I don’t like Family Guy and South Park, but that is just scratching the surface of what you can watch. At times it can be easy to believe that they are the only options out there, both of them having a fairly large claim over the genre.
Note: I am not including anime, it’s kind of category all it’s own
Rick and Morty
The most basic description of this show is that it’s a sci-fi dark comedy. Truly that only scratches the surface of Rick and Morty. It’s a comedy, drama, sci-fi, fantasy, horror, slice of life show that seems to tap into just a bit of everything. Some episodes stay more on the surface of things, making you laugh, while giving sci-fi fans easter eggs to enjoy. Other episodes will hit you hard with interesting (often depressing) messages about the nature of relationships and the universe. It’s does a great job at balancing all these different themes, and is one of the most memorable shows you will see. It’s made me laugh, cry, cringe, and even want to turn it off at times. I love Rick and Morty, and you really need to catch up before the third season airs.
I often live in a world where everyone already knows and loves Archer, only to find out the show is dismissed by some. If you have blown this off as just another copy and paste adult animated series you are missing out. Archer honors many classic spy shows and movies while following the ridiculous, yet lovable, cast of characters. It stays more on the surface of things, bringing laughs and entertainment, but every once in awhile it goes into deeper character development and stories. The cast is where the show shines, they are easy to love and easy to hate all at the same time. If you love action and dark humor you need to be watching Archer.
This show is one of the best for taking on issues of racism, culture, class, and stereotypes. Not one of the best animated shows to do so, one of the best, period. It can be an extremely challenging show to watch, but still more than worth it. It’s funny, but holds no punches when it has a point to make. The show sadly ended a few short year ago, but is on Netflix, with rumors of more services picking it up soon. If you haven’t seen this you need to.
I think this show gets easily dismissed because people assume it has the same formula as Family Guy. It really and truly is nothing like those shows. Bob is not a lovable idiot, he is a hard working amazing father. None of the children have a slightly hateful relationship with their parents, in fact the entire family is pretty close. Louise is not a Stewie replacement. The only thing it has in common with Family Guy is it can be ridiculous at times. Don’t dismiss this show. It’s a funny and pretty heartwarming look at family life. It is hilarious, but it’s comedy comes from a completely different place and is rarely on the dark side. Watch. This. Show.
The Venture Brothers
I am not entirely in love with some of the direction this show has taken, but it still holds a special place in my heart. The show has many themes, and spoofs many different genres and characters. At the heart of the show is looking at what would happen to a character like Johnny Quest when he grows up. Dr Venture was a boy wonder (like you would see on an old tv show) and it’s completely destroyed his life. He is unable to live up to expectations set for him, is incapable of making real connections, and is to an extent a failure. Being a boy wonder has shaped his life, and not in a good way. Those around him are also highly impacted by the way Venture was raised. His friends and enemies have at various points been sucked into the vortex that was his life, and almost exclusively negatively impacted by it. It’s strange, dark, and entertaining.
Honorable Mention: Gravity Falls
I debated whether or not to include this show for the simple reason that it’s not for adults. Gravity Falls is a Disney animated series about a brother and sister sent to live in Gravity Falls. Not long after being there they discover that there is something strange (or rather a number of somethings) about the town. It brings in a great deal of supernatural with it’s comedy. Despite not being for adults it is a show that adults can easily enjoy. I don’t say this lightly. While I like a number of animated shows for kids I am hard pressed to say that it’s something many adults could like. Gravity Falls is smart, and not in the “we are going to hide sex jokes in Loony Tunes” smart. Rather it focuses on clever humor that both adults and children will enjoy. Many of the jokes in the show that might go over kids heads won’t do so because they are dirty but rather because they are truly intelligent, or easter eggs for things that kids probably haven’t come into contact with. It only gets an honorable mention because it’s still at it’s core a kids show. A few of the episodes, while entertaining, are not as impressive. The main story, and clever nature of this show made me feel like I would be remiss if I didn’t at least mention it.